Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Daily Palette


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 07:01, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

The Daily Palette

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

No evidence the subject has received sufficient coverage in reliable, third-party sources to merit a standalone article. Article created and principally edited by a close associate (see File:Thomas_a._bliss.jpg) and the project's creator himself. Insufficient third-party coverage to mount a neutral, non-COI rewrite. -- Rrburke (talk) 03:35, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 04:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Unable to locate significant verifiable information from reliable 3rd party sources to support a claim to meeting notability guidelines. There is an unrelated "The Daily Palette" that also produces G-Hits. Dloh  cierekim  03:32, 1 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Do not Delete Please refer to footnotes; e.g., http://www.callithump.org/art_vending_history/index.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tbliss558 (talk • contribs) 01:51, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Saw that. While helpful, it does not represent significant coverage of sufficient depth and breadth. Dloh cierekim  13:38, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - insufficient reliable coverage to demonstrate notability.-- K orr u ski Talk 10:13, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.