Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dalek Prime

from VfD:

Reason why I recommended this article for VfD: Poorly written fancruft, probably vanity for someone's un-notable online fantasy story. &mdash;ExplorerCDT 22:03, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete &mdash;ExplorerCDT 22:03, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep I've cleaned up the vanity part of this article; Dr. Who trivia does belong here IMHO. Samboy 22:26, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC) Merge in to Dalek Ranks Samboy 23:58, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. More notable than the minor elves that we have articles on. Dr Zen 01:04, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, merge into Dalek or create a single page for all these dalek-related issues if you must. ("They're not breasts, they're dalek bumps". Ooh, that quote fits here as well as the porn star VfD a few entries up.) --fvw *  01:56, 2004 Dec 15 (UTC)
 * Delete: Merge all into a Dalek page. Round 'em up and put 'em where they can be found, where they can mingle and prosper. Geogre 01:58, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Perhaps we should have a category for Doctor Who topics. That would have the same effect, and it would also preserve the idea of having one topic per article page.  Turning Dalek into a list of Dalek-related articles is a bad idea. Factitious 17:25, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: DCEdwards1966 04:22, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Esoteric fancruft. Indrian 06:36, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete, or light merge if someone does it soon. Daleks as a whole are notable, "Sanchez, the dalek" is not. -R. fiend 06:46, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Exterminate. Susvolans (pigs can fly) 14:42, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. This was nominated for being poorly written and probable vanity.  The article is no longer poorly written or vanity, though it could still use some cleanup and expansion. Factitious 17:25, Dec 15, 2004 (UTC)
 * Merge to Dalek now that the vanity content has been eliminated. -- Antaeus Feldspar 21:03, 15 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. One article on Dalek is enough.  --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 04:13, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dalek Ranks. Merge already done.  The Steve  07:48, Dec 16, 2004 (UTC)
 * The article Dalek Ranks needs a rename to Dalek ranks 132.205.45.148 15:33, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect since it is already properly merged with the Dalek ranks article. Had it not been I would have voted keep since the article is better than useless. 129.177.61.123 13:38, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Redirect. P Ingerson 15:44, 16 Dec 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete as I can't imagine the redirect serving any useful purpose. Anyone looking for Dalek info will go to Dalek.
 * Redirect. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 17:56, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion