Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Danger Team


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Helaine Head. Content has already been merged into the target. I can't find an elegant way to perform a history merge, however. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:30, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

The Danger Team

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable television show. No claim of notability. The extent of apparent of independent reliable coverage is "A ball of space goop crash-lands in a sculptor's studio. Naturally, he molds the goop into three figurines. The figurines come to life, but only the artist can see them. The artist and the goop men team up to go fight crime." Which is not enough and make no claim of significance. Nothing obvious in google. PROD removed by creator. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:03, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've found a few sources and have put them in the article, but I'm not entirely convinced that this is enough. The two reviews are great and definitely help towards notability, but the other three I'm not entirely happy with. They feel more trivial than anything else, especially the EW mention and the MWJS is behind a paywall so I can't see how in-depth the mention is so I'm going to count that as trivial as well. The Tuscaloosa News entry is three paragraphs, but it is also fairly brief. It's not just a press release, but neither is it so obviously in-depth that I'd absolutely say it counts towards notability. Even if it does, which could be argued either way, I'm not sure that 3 sources is really enough to show notability for a pilot that was only aired once.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:36, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Is merge to Helaine Head a possibility? Stuartyeates (talk) 08:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
 * I would say that's appropriate, since she did direct the piece. Her article is also overly short, so it'd be useful in fleshing out her article. I'll go work on that now.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:04, 3 December 2012 (UTC)


 * History merge into Helaine Head as Tokyogirl79 has beautifully done. — WylieCoyote 00:24, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 8 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &#0032; ⋘HueSatLum ?&thinsp;❢⋙ 22:57, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * History merge into Helaine Head 1292simon (talk) 00:49, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Automatic Strikeout  ( T •  C) 21:50, 17 December 2012 (UTC)


 * I am afraid that a history merge really is necessary in this case.— S Marshall T/C 15:13, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.