Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Darkness on Hill Street


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted by  as "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion". Non-admin closure — frankie (talk) 15:05, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

The Darkness on Hill Street

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Unreleased indy movie. No google or google news coverage. not notable. PROD'ed by two seperate users, removed by creator without comment or edit. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

My page should not be deleted, because I have submitted my website to google but they have not posted it up yet. I also worked for an earlier company, R.E.S.S., productions, which is also on Google results. My site will show up in time. I also have the official website address posted, and have had over 100 visitors to my site. Please do not delete my page, as this is a scripted film in the making at this moment. Disastermaster16 (talk) 21:40, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Disastermaster16


 * If you want to contest the deletion, you should post your comment on the articles for deletion page, not on this articles talk page. there is a link to the deletion request included in the box on your article. Based on your comment above, I believe you have a conflict of interest with this article, and are likely the creator, or related closely. Additionally having your own site listed in google is not satisfactory to have a page. You must recieve coverage. In this case it would likely be any newspapers or magazines covering your filming, or industry news. Since you have a relitively famous star, you may have some industry coverage as well, but I did not see any in my google searches. I will copy your comment to the AFD page. Gaijin42 (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete- Does not seem to meetWP:N, a good faith search found no reliable sources.-- SKATER  Is Back 22:01, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as A7/G11 - Previous prod expired and it was deleted. Still makes no claims of notability, and can find no reliable sources to support notability.  This appears to be an attempt to promote the future film release.  ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 22:08, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – Unremarkable film with void coverage in independent reliable media. undefined — Bill william compton  Talk   22:12, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.