Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Declining Importance of Meta Keywords, Description Tags, Alt Tags, etc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. (aeropa gitica) 12:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

The Declining Importance of Meta Keywords, Description Tags, Alt Tags, etc., Content resource
Unencyclopedic, OR, essay. Originally contained ad link, which was removed by author along with prod tag. -- Merope 21:04, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. May just be unsourced rather than OR, but definitely an encyclopedia essay. Kickaha Ota 21:05, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, essay, not encyclopedic, possibly violates WP:NOR. -- Kinu t /c  21:10, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete An essay that has not fitting for a encyclopedia. Some P.   E  rson  21:26, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete essay. --דניאל ~ Danielrocks123 talk  contribs   Count 21:45, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * This and content resource are both adverts for the author's web site. The same author has posted them to several self-submission web sites all over the World Wide Web, such as here.  Unsurprisingly, the web site is another "search engine optimizer".  There's no point in trying to turn this into an encyclopaedia article.  Delete. Uncle G 22:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete essay. Danny Lilithborne 01:26, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Per Uncle G's comments, I have added Content resource to the deletion discussion.   -- Merope 12:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all. This was a poor attempt to spam for contentresourcecenter.com, and once those links are removed, what's left is OR essay not worth keeping. Fan-1967 12:56, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete an essay about some SEO stuff or something. Contributes nothing to the discussion about HTML standards and metadata, contributes unsourced and hard to verify "fancruft", if you can borrow the term, on discussion of SEO. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:11, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.