Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Demon of River Heights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  SilkTork  *YES! 01:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

The Demon of River Heights

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

First, author apparently wasn't sure what the supposed "23rd installment" of the series was called and created Terror in the Outback, Mystery in the Outback, and this one (The Demon of River Heights). I prodded all three, Prod for this one removed. Then I checked the company's website, they are barely listing the 21st installment.

If indeed this was announced as claimed, wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that the first place to look is their website, and that there should be #22 before #23?

(Hoax? Real? Notable? Crystal ball?) Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:37, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Strong Delete. WP:CRYSTAL violation. Very clear. --Manway (talk) 09:09, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete Ill-informed, unsourced, badly written WP:CRYSTAL. Favonian (talk) 11:51, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Delete Nancy Drew is a series of video games now? Well anyway WP:Crystal Simonm223 (talk) 15:35, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:CRYSTAL. Joe Chill (talk) 01:36, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:08, 25 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete – per lack of verifiability as well as clear crystalballery. –MuZemike 18:11, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.