Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Destined One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keeping for the time being based on rationale. Please consider improving, or reaching out to an editor with knowledge of Chinese media, to help improve it. If that fails, feel free to WP:PROD. Missvain (talk) 18:30, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

The Destined One

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A run-of-the-mill TV show with no significant media coverage. The only marginally noteworthy aspect of the show is the possible "scandal" (I use this idiom in the broadest possible terms) of one of the participants being in a relationship, and this would fail WP:SINGLEEVENT. With the proliferation of online media, there are millions of TV shows being made each year, and there's nothing to demonstrate the notably of this one. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 16:09, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:29, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: I see some coverage of the show's crossover with a fictional show, My One in a Million, on a marketing site and in an interview with one of the One in a Million cast members. It's not a lot, but it's a little hard to judge just by searching in English. I expect that an editor who knows Chinese media would find more coverage. Toughpigs (talk) 03:58, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:25, 8 January 2020 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:49, 15 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.