Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Detachment Kit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  keep, nom withdrawn. NAC. Cliff smith talk  16:30, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

The Detachment Kit

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

I can't find significant coverage in reliable sources to establish the notability of this band. Their only releases are either self-released or on minor labels. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 12:14, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. I would say that these qualify as significant coverage: Chicago Tribune, Washington Post, PioneerLocal, PopMatters, PopMatters, University Wire, Daily Herald, PopMatters, CMJ New Music Monthly, CMJ New Music Monthly, CMJ New Music Report, Allmusic bio, Allmusic review, Allmusic review. Further brief mentions: CMJ New Music Monthly, SPIN. SpinART isn't what I'd call a minor label - not a major but big enough to be noticed. The article needs a lot of work, but the sources are there to allow it be knocked into shape.--Michig (talk) 14:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC) Frenchkiss Records also seems to be too notable to be described as a minor label.--Michig (talk) 14:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:41, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Michig. Joe Chill (talk) 18:26, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Withdraw nom per Michig, I should have seen those sources, feel free to close this Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 08:31, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.