Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Digestive Hour


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. NW ( Talk ) 23:20, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

The Digestive Hour

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a recently coined word, covered with a semi-scientific explanation JoJan (talk) 15:10, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Looks pretty much like something made up one day - the reference to "Moore, Duong et al." seems to mean those are the names of the students who came up with it. No reliable sources that I can find. Olaf Davis (talk) 15:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear WP:MADEUP Violation. --WngLdr34 (talk) 16:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No substantial mention in any reliable secondary sources that I can find.  Appears to be a neologism. &mdash;gorgan_almighty (talk) 16:41, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. --Bobak (talk) 17:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. A rather amusing hoax. Nice try, guys, but this one has to be excreted. No offense.--JohnnyB256 (talk) 18:02, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete under the invisible CSD provision for hoaxes and nonsense. JBsupreme (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a something made up one day. These guys are trying to be humorous, and even succeeding, but Wikipedia is not a humor magazine, it's an encyclopedia. Invertzoo (talk) 20:39, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:MADEUP. Joe Chill (talk) 23:56, 1 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.