Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Beyond nomination, no arguments for deletion. (non-admin closure) Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 14:47, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

The Disappearance of Eleanor Rigby

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unreferenced article about a non-notable future film fails WP:FFILM and WP:CRYSTAL - MrX 14:36, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article does have some sources, and the fact that the lead roles are played by James McAvoy and Jessica Chastain suggests that the films (this ia a two-film project) are notable enough to warrant an article prior to release. WP:FFILM does not apply; the project has already completed principal photography, and WP:FFILM is for projects that haven't started filming yet. The project is notable under WP:NFF which covers as-yet-unreleased films. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Initially the article was rough, admittedly, but a search brought up multiple sources that showed that the film had moved into post-production and looks to pass WP:NFF. Easy keep.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   17:20, 27 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep - The film is receiving significant coverage and looks to meet the threshold for retention. Sea photo Talk  02:40, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per the notability guidelines for future films. MrX, WP:CRYSTAL does not forbid reporting properly referenced discussion about a film in production. Rather, it is about the placement of information, and the consensus is to use the start of filming as a threshold for creating a stand-alone article. Before that, there is not a strong guarantee of a final product, and early coverage tends to be merged elsewhere. If filming does start, it is much more likely for there to be a final product for which we will ultimately discuss film "in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the reception and significance of notable works". Erik (talk &#124; contribs) 13:21, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn - Obviously I erred in nominating this article. I almost always look for sources in Google news at a minimum, so I'm not sure what happened here. In any case, could I ask an uninvolved editor or admin to please close this? - MrX 13:37, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.