Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Document


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 05:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The Document

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

There are no reliable sources that claim The Document is an official Linkin Park album. Other sources state it is an unofficial bootleg. , and thus does not belong on Wikipedia -- ►ShadowJester07  20:59, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete, Billboard lists "MVD Audio" as the record label not Warner Bros, combined with the LP association forums post it really looks like a bootleg. If it is indeed a legitimate release the article can be rewritten. Na uf ana  :  talk  22:49, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Do we not list notable bootlegs? Notability doesn't preclude bootlegs if they're of note, be it for notoriety or otherwise (I've read notability several times and don't recall seeing anything to that effect, but would gladly consider it if you show me the page). These bootlegs known as The Document aren't something I've heard of, but if they're getting the attention of Billboard, it's possible that they are in fact notable. I'm not voting to keep or delete, just pointing out that even if it's not official, it still can be deserving a page.-- linca linca  00:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment,First of all if it is a bootleg then it's a bootleg purporting to be an official release, which would only cause confusion. secondly if it is a bootleg then wouldn't the notability still fail per WP:CRYSTAL? It hasn't even been released yet. Na uf ana  :  talk  01:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree about it being subject to Crystal Ball, but I thought I might just pose the question. All I'm saying is that when the "document" (crap name) is released, it may pass WP:NOTEand may be suitable to keep. However, Crystal Ball is talking about items atht are completely speculative, however the album seems to be actually get compiled, so there could be some weight behind it. I'm not necessarily for keeping the article, but I'm for giving it a few weeks to see if it gets its feet. If it's still a rickety page, then I'm for its removal. -- linca linca  07:10, 7 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete There don't seem to be any reliable sources at all about this record. All we have is a few links to pages on reliable sites that have zero information about it.  Perhaps when it's actually released, we'll see some discussion in reliable sources, but until then we shouldn't have an article about it. JulesH 14:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 12:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Warner Bros Records did not make a statement of this greatest hist album, and neither did Linkin Park. No official sources...
 * Delete. verifiability problme. `'Miikka 21:19, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.