Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dog Hut


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 04:15, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

The Dog Hut

 * – ( View AfD View log )

While this doesn't fit into an A7 subject, I'm not seeing any evidence or sources of actual notability here. Maybe someone can find some, but all I can dig out is this place's own website. Courcelles 23:20, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 19:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - It  may  be a 'school' but  it  fails WP:ORG  just  as any accredited high street   TESOL  college, language, or cram  school  would.  No sources found to  assert notability. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 19:42, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. Probably a hoax, definitely unverified. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 21:20, 24 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as non-notable and joke. It appears to exists as a dog-training centre, not the same as a college of further education.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 17:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)


 * This is neither a joke nor a WP:hoax. The organisation  exists according  to  their website "Registered Company Address: Linden House, Linden Close, Tunbridge Wells, Kent TN4 8HH. Company Number: 06972315 UKPRN 10030370", although their accreditation  for the provision  of City & Guilds programmes may  be subject  to  further scrutiny. The article  is most  likely a creation  made in  good faith by  someone who  did not  inform  themselves first  of our criteria for notability and the requirement  for reliable sources. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * That's exactly what I said -- it appears to exist and be a dog-training school. To describe a dog training school as a "college of further education", as this article does, is either a massive misunderstanding of the British educational system or a joke.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 06:24, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I think  the point  is that  they  teach  people to  train and handle dogs -  which  is a profession. If they  are misrepresenting  themselves as a college of further education,  that's their problem,  but  it's not  ours to  say  it's a joke or a hoax. The article will  probably be deleted anyway.  Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:23, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I do not say that the organisation in question is misrepresenting itself -- that's a pretty serious accusation. I say that this article is mispresenting the organisation, and that this article is thus some kind of joke.  Sergeant Cribb (talk) 09:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't think it is misrepresenting them the way you say it is; it appears that it's not a dog-training school (i.e a place where dogs are trained) but a dog-trainers school - i.e. a place where people can take further education courses in Animal Care and and such. Still, probably not notable. MorganaFiolett (talk) 12:11, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.