Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dons of Necropolis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jenks24 (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

The Dons of Necropolis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has previously been deleted via prod. This is a self-published book, no evidence that it meets the notability guidelines. Rotten regard      Softnow  03:49, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Cheers,  Riley   Huntley  05:23, 15 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete There is no independent coverage of this book much less significant coverage. It fails the notability guidelines. --Bejnar (talk) 10:21, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. A search brought up a complete lack of reliable sources for this book. The only things that are out there are tons of merchant sites, false hits, a few non-usable blog/merchant site reviews, and some primary sources. Not much, all in all.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 13:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. I couldn't find anything either. Dengero (talk) 16:19, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.