Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Down Fall Of Purpose Driven Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was speedy delete (A1).  howch e  ng   {chat} 07:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

The Down Fall Of Purpose Driven Music
If you're going to try to get things like this on Wikipedia, don't start out by saying your article is "possibly one-sided." From the title, I doubt that possibility could be averted by any means, and this really seems like a rant in embryo and not an encyclopedia article. Daniel Case 06:09, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete it isn't an article yet... though the title sounds like an editorial not an article Sethie 06:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Not an article and not on a subject that is worthy of an article. Cedars 06:24, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as it is a single sentence promising to be non-NPOV original research essay. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-03 06:43Z 
 * Speedy delete per WP:NOT. This looks like the author is going to start an opinionated personal essay, and since those do not qualify as Wikipedia articles, it would probably be best to stop him now before he devotes a lot of time to typing it in. --Metropolitan90 06:44, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately WP:NOT cannot be used to justify speedy deletion. However A1&mdash;very short articles providing little or no context&mdash;can be speedy deleted. I have already nominated it. GeorgeStepanek\talk 06:56, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.