Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Down Low


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. KTC (talk) 00:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

The Down Low

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete - there are not independent reliable sources that indicate that this particular episode is independently notable. PROD removed with the claim that redirection is always preferred to deletion, which is patently false, and in this case is untenable because of the article title's ambiguity. Buck Winston (talk) 17:54, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 20:19, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment - while not always done, I think redirect is often valid. No opinion on this case. Bearian (talk) 22:08, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ⋘ HueSatLum ?&thinsp;❢ ⋙ 20:27, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:23, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep Consensus appears to be that each House episode merits its own article. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 13:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * keep Many major television shows have individual articles for episodes, and House shouldn't be an exception. While this article doesn't have a Production or Reception section, improvement could be made to include those sections. In my opinion, this article needs work, but does not need to be deleted. I can see how the title may be an issue. Perhaps the article could be moved to The Down Low (House) or something? Greengreengreen  red  09:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.