Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dukes of Hazzard

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily kept - bad faith nomination. Dunc|&#9786; 12:33, 22 September 2005 (UTC)

The Dukes of Hazzard
This show is racist. Delete it!!!64.12.116.67 03:39, 22 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Disagree - This topic (racism of the show) has been discussed on the discussion page. While I agree that a page about a show like you think this one is would be disgusting, such a criteria is not in the list of reasons for deletion.  If you think that this article is POV, then the deletion policy page suggests that the POV be corrected rather than deleting the article. Val42 05:32, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, unlogged-in user nominating, inappropriate reason to delete. DDerby (talk) 07:05, 22 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Speedy KeepNetwork television program on air for 6 years on network TV in the US and shown throughout the world. Notable 2005 film based on the program in The Dukes of Hazzard (film). I repeat my concern about anonymous users nominating articles on clearly notable television programs. The previous two debates resulted in speedy keeps. Even if there were verifiable and substantial allegations of racism about the program, that should be discussed in the article in an NPOV manner. Capitalistroadster 07:39, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. This appears to be yet another bad-faith nomination to delete an article about a well-known television series. --Metropolitan90 07:40, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per Metropolitan90. --Angr/undefined 07:54, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, and make a new policy that anon AfD noms must either be seconded by a signed-in editor, or reverted out of AfD. -- BD2412 talk 09:22, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep, we don't need a specific policy for anon users. We should have one for nominations that don't cite a valid reason. A more serious example: Nazis are disgusting to a lot of people, but deleting the article about it, would be censorship and wiping a problem under the rug. POV problems must be edited, not deleted. - Mgm|(talk) 10:28, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, this is a bad faith vfd by the same person who put up 21 Jump Street the variation in IP is probably due to proxy servers. Usrnme h8er 11:07, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and ban this IP. 23skidoo 12:32, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.