Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dumping Ground Future Characters


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

The Dumping Ground Future Characters

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A "future characters" article isn't useful because it will be empty most of the time and, once the series is over, forever. Future characters can be listed in a "future characters" section of an existing article on the series or on the characters of the series. Largoplazo (talk) 17:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * MERGE to List of The Dumping Ground characters. That way the characters can be freely moved from "future" to "present" and thence to "past" as appropriate. Crow  Caw  17:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of The Dumping Ground characters as per Crow, since they might as well be included with a note that they have been announced. A separate article for this is not helpful in the long-run. It's not doing too much good now, since it contains just one individual. GABgab 23:18, 13 July 2016 (UTC) See below. GABgab 23:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:50, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Redirecting is useless because no one's going to search for "The Dumping Ground Future Characters", "The Dumping Ground Characters" yes but the former no!, I've merged the content in to the characters article so there's no need for this article. – Davey 2010 Talk 20:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks, . Now, I think we can delete, as it makes more sense to have a single "characters" article, rather than a "characters" article, a "past characters" article, and a "future characters" article. GABgab 23:03, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries, Happy editing :), – Davey 2010 Talk 23:42, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as there's nothing actually suggestive of keeping this as there would simply not be anything close to convincing substance. SwisterTwister   talk  23:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.