Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dunn Experience


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy delete, patent nonsense (or WP:SNOW, if you don't think it's patent nonsense). NawlinWiki 20:30, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

The Dunn Experience
Completely incoherent, but not gibberish, so not patent nonsense. Can't even tell what the article is about. eaolson 03:50, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to be a hoax. Only 13 Google results, few if any are relevant.--TBC TaLk?!? 03:52, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete dumb. Danny Lilithborne 03:54, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete What is this article supposed to be about? Encyclopedia articles are not supposed to keep their readers (let alone editors) in the dark. Most likely a hoax. --physicq210 06:12, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Appears to be either some club of friends (CSD A7) or something made up in school. Neither makes a good article. - Mgm|(talk) 09:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. I can't work out what it's all about either - fails Verifiability, whatever it is. Bob talk 11:29, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Sounds like something a few schoolkids made up. +Fin- 13:45, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Probable hoax, POV, unencyclopedic, bad formatting, cryptic; you name it, you can throw the book at it.  Should've been speedied.  Djcartwright 20:04, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - CSD-A1 - Absolute nonsense. Torinir  ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 20:37, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The Delete Experience. Me, I would have speedied this one. After all, the db-nonsense tag is not just for gibberish, but for articles that "provide no meaningful content or history." Something doesn't have to be gibberish to be meaningless. Pleather 23:53, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - Correct. And this "article" is beyond meaningless. Torinir  ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 00:52, 15 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom (WP:NFT). "The Dunn Experience is an unknown phenomenon to all who have not been a part of it." Obviously not many people other than the author has been part of it. Ohconfucius 02:45, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:HOAX. &mdash; Khoikhoi 03:51, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.