Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dying Fragments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dark Tranquillity. Consensus is definitely that this album does not warrant an article, however there are valid suggestions that this be merged/redirected and there are not objections to that possibility from those arguing for deletion. It's unclear to me whether there is actually anything to merge beyond what is already mentioned in the Dark Tranquillity article (hence just a redirect for now), however if anyone wants to undertake that they can do so and obviously find any needed info in the article history. --Bigtimepeace | talk | contribs 05:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

The Dying Fragments

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Spotted on patrol. Limited release of this album coupled with only a track listing on the sole reference tells me that there's no notability. It may be speedyable under A9, but I'm giving it a shot here.  Dennis The Tiger  (Rawr and stuff) 15:39, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment - It's not speedable under A9; to quote the CSD page: "An article about a musical recording that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant and where the artist's article does not exist." The artist has a page. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  16:01, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Such a limited release it'd be near impossible to establish any notability here. Rehevkor ✉  17:04, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Nothing here or on search engine to suggest notability. Aiken   &#9835;  17:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 18:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect into Dark Tranquillity. Bearian (talk) 00:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep or merge. Limited editions doesn't make something non-notable. AFAIK there's just one Mona Lisa. --Wicked247 (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Comparing this to the Mona Lisa is a pretty big logical fallacy. Rehevkor ✉  13:43, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Extremely limited release with even less media coverage of substance; fails WP:NALBUM. The sole reference doesn't even mention the album in question—nothing verifiable from a reliable source to be merged. TheJazzDalek (talk) 11:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge into into Dark Tranquillity, if not keep. All the other albums produced by this band have their own article. -- Pink Bull  20:40, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.