Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Eagle's Eye (serial)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  07:25, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

The Eagle's Eye (serial)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no indication that this subject is notable, no references given Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:18, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

I realize that, but because of a problem with the local Bell cable service here in Southern Ontario, where we came for the annual Thanksgiving dinner, I will not be able to access that information until we return to Ottawa, Canada's capital and my birthplace. Therefore, I am asking you to bear with me until I do revise it and not to delete it.Glammazon (talk) 07:36, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. Considering the earliness of the serial, there's a reasonable amount of info about it (Silentera is back?) and images. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 10:19, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Keep. A serial of 20 episodes seems notable enough, and I suspect notions that it's not reflects Recentism.--Johnsemlak (talk) 12:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment:
 * Note. If the serial survives, it should be moved to The Eagle's Eye, which is currently a redirect elsewhere. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:55, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Optakeover (U)(T)(C) 10:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 01:05, 24 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.