Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Eagle Extra


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Fairfax, Minnesota. --  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 03:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

The Eagle Extra

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Fails WP:GNG, WP:CORP, WP:NOTADVERTISING and WP:PROMOTION. Article has multiple issues. It unreferenced and shows no significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. It is a very promotional article. Lastly the articles creator is the owner, editor and publisher of The Eagle Extra, Kevin Michael Schafer, who has a clear WP:CONFLICT. --ARTEST4ECHO (talk 17:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Merge: Given the changes made by Eclipsed I agree that a Merge to Fairfax, Minnesota is now best.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk 22:02, 1 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - small town free weekly. Bearian (talk) 20:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * It's not free, it costs 50 cents. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, it is a non-notable small town weekly that costs half a dollar. The article has no reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 23:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete Small town paper with little information included in the article. Housewatcher (talk) 02:19, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Merge to Fairfax, Minnesota. Promo material removed, leaving behind a very small stub. Some secondary refs found, but not much more then listings.  Notability, in reference to other Minnesota Newspapers, is still in question.   If paper is of same level as the community papers listed on Template:Minnesota_Newspapers, then keep.  But latest online figures show very small circulation of under 200.  Only notable to Fairfax, Minnesota.     Eclipsed   ¤     08:16, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions.  —• Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:36, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.