Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Eighth Hour Romance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete, better argument against inclusion per policy than for inclusion. Daniel (talk) 03:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

The Eighth Hour Romance

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Does not meet the criteria of Notability (music). Article claims only local club dates, with one EP released and a second EP in production. Article also announces that the group is breaking up. Donald Albury 21:35, 11 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Band doesn't seem to have any notability outside of it local area. Inhumer (talk) 22:07, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  13:20, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Don't Delete Local notability articles have a place on wikipedia as well. Consider articles on schools, theaters ,or radio stations. Group has two EPs out and has a notable fan base. Saksjn (talk) 13:46, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Fanbase does not count toward notability.


 * Don't delete This band has been the subject an article in The Ledger. Has also performed at Southeastern University at an event for the Red Cross. --Mayor Coffee Bean (talk) 16:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. Please read Notability (music), which states the criteria a musical group needs to meet to be considered notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. Please address how this band meets those criteria. -- Donald Albury 20:31, 13 February 2008 (UTC)


 * A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria:
 * It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable.
 * This criterion includes published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, books, magazine articles, and television documentaries.
 * The band has been featured in the articles mentioned by Mayor Coffee Bean. Saksjn (talk) 14:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but "subject of multiple non-trivial published works" means a lot more than two paragraphs in a local music column and one sentence in coverage of an event. -- Donald Albury 19:39, 15 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.