Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Elevator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 05:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

The Elevator

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Magazine with no assertion of notability. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:31, 24 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Feedback? Rather than contesting every change, could you at least be constructive and outline aspects you think need changing.  "Magazine with no assertion of notability" isn't very descriptive and implies that you either assume the magazine is fake or has no worth, which is a fairly bold statement to make for this publication.  The legitimacy of the publication should be evident by the presence of an ISSN... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seopher (talk • contribs)  — Seopher (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Response It might help you to read the criteria for notability at Wikipedia.  It is no judgement on the existence or value of the magazine, but merely a question of whether this magazine is so significant that an international encyclopedia would require an article about it.  All you need to do is add a few independent sources that discuss the magazine's importance in its field. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:57, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete.  The title of the magazine makes it a little difficult to google for reliable sources of notability.  Using the search term, "The Elevator," "magazine," and "HEPT", I found 0 hits using google news, and only a few hits using google, none of which appeared to affirm the notability of this publication.  Of course, I am open to the possibility that my  methodology was flawed; I'd be glad if someone with 133ter google-fu can find the sources that I couldn't. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:01, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable. The article offers no clues to notability and, as above, I've been unable to find any independent reliable sources. Nuttah (talk) 14:40, 28 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.