Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Emotron


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 00:11, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

The Emotron

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Not sure this artist meets criteria for Notability:Music. Article does not cite non-trivial independent sources about touring and relies on YouTube and Wikipedia. Not sure if any of the CDs can be considered to have been released by major independent companies. Wkharrisjr (talk) 18:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)


 * 1) Keep This article just passes both WP: MUSICIAN and WP: GNG. Could use some work, though. Electriccatfish2 (talk) 21:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete This article fails both WP: MUSICIAN and WP: GNG. Could use some deletion. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:04, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Neutral. If Asbestos Records meets category 5 of WP:MUSIC as "one of the more important indie labels" then I think this artist meets WP:MUSIC -- if not, not.  There is an article for Asbestos Records but it seems to have issues, so I'm going to fence-sit here.  I'm not sufficiently familiar with indie music to give an opinion on the label.  I can see no other way in which this artist meets WP:GNG or WP:MUSIC.  Ubelowme (talk) 21:21, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 03:05, 2 July 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.