Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Empire Strikes Back (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. —Quarl (talk) 2007-03-11 01:46Z 

The Empire Strikes Back (disambiguation)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

All of the links within the page are already linked within the main The Empire Strikes Back article. The page also includes a number of somewhat trivial references to the phrase from the media. The Filmaker 22:26, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: I don't see how many 'Empire Stikes Back' entries you can have, outside of what's already present. It's already well linked elsewhere and this page is essentially a duplication.  Seicer  (talk) (contribs) 00:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per comments in prior discussion.  Articles for deletion/The Empire Strikes Back (disambiguation)/archive1.  And bad form for not linking to the previous discussion.  The Empire Strikes Back, like Star Wars (disambiguation) is a term that has come up in real life, as such, it's more appropriate to disambiguate here than mention it in the main article.  I also find it to be better from an organizational perspective than links within an article.  FrozenPurpleCube 01:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's perfectly reasonable and acceptable to have a dab page for multiple uses of a title, even within a franchise, and there are also other uses that justify a dab page. I agree that the fact this has previously been nominated -- and kept -- should have been mentioned. In fact I just reminded myself that I also voted to keep in that discussion, too. 23skidoo 01:33, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. The disambiguation page lists 13 different objects and/or concepts. Not all of them are relevant to the main Star Wars article, and the disambiguation page serves a valid purpose in directing users to the multiple related uses of the term. -- Black Falcon 09:21, 10 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.