Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Enchanted Ceiling (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Harry and the Potters. If someone wants to redirect to specific sections, that's fine too. Jenks24 (talk) 22:28, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

The Enchanted Ceiling
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Harry and the Potters are a notable band, however their floppy disks, vinyls, EPs, splits, casettes, compilations, fan remixes and live albums & DVDs are not. The Enchanted Ceiling was listed up for deletion 2 years ago because no reliable sources were found to verify its notability. After 2 years, none have since been found. Thanks! Alex Douglas (talk) 02:28, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 15.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  02:41, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages because no reliable sources have been found to verify their notability. Thanks! Alex Douglas (talk) 03:35, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
 * - EP; article has one reference from reliable source, an interview where the band passingly mentioned it "the last songs we recorded were for an EP, and the songs focused on tiny little inconsistencies".
 * - remix album; article only has references from primary sources.
 * - live CD & DVD; article only has references from primary sources.
 * - compilation album; article has one reference from reliable source, an interview where the band passingly mentioned it "is made up of songs we’d released on comps or 7-inches over the past seven or eight years or stuff that had been unreleased that hadn’t been put on previous albums".
 * - compilation album; article only has references from primary sources.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 06:02, 15 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete all or Redirect all to Harry and the Potters. I agree that the band is notable, but I am not finding evidence of their recordings meeting WP:GNG or WP:NALBUMS. The latter guideline's wording has evolved in the two years since the previous nomination. Current sentences like "All articles on albums, singles or other recordings must meet the basic criteria at the notability guidelines, with significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and "That an album is an officially released recording by a notable musician or ensemble is not by itself reason for a standalone article" suggest that, unless this coverage exists, these albums/EPs do not warrant individual articles.  Gongshow  Talk 23:20, 16 May 2012 (UTC)   Gongshow  Talk 17:30, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   21:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → B  music  ian  03:59, 31 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Harry and the Potters or Harry and the Potters discography per User:Gongshow, above (although I'm tempted to say the discography article should also be redirected or deleted). Band is notable, albums and songs are not independently notable, so redirect to band. We could even redirect to specific anchors in the band article about the time in which each was released, or we could redirect to Harry and the Potters. - Jorgath (talk) (contribs) 19:04, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect as suggested, plausible search terms, but WP:NALBUMS criteria does not appear to be met. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 08:04, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.