Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Enclave (Computer Gaming Community)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. --Sam Blanning(talk) 12:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

The Enclave (Computer Gaming Community)
Gaming clan. Sort of borders on spam, doesn't establish notability. Zoz (t) 17:32, 28 June 2006 (UTC) do not delete. they are a historic gaming community that has been featured in PC gamer uk. honestly you bastards don't delete it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.76.7.92 (talk • contribs) 23:29, 3 July 2006.
 * Delete, non-notable. &mdash;Stormie 23:31, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

I could be wrong about this..Wikipedia is renowned for its vast knowledge of seamlessly internet data. That is a huge compliment. To delete something such as Gaming...from your wikipedia articles, is like tearing words out of the dictionary. You want to be renowned for having information on everything, then do just that. If you want to take it a step further maybe make a whole subject area to gaming. You could pioneer the way for the worlds first Gaming Database...or, you can be nazi's and delete the 3 KB file taking up all that space on your servers in hopes of making more room for pointless articles such as woman's implants. I think this paragraph says what I want it to, so in conclusion. WE like you. I like you. My term paper and my college research papers liked you. Don't make me turn to www.questia.com. Adieu.

Mistwraith~ —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mistwraith (talk • contribs) 00:37, 5 July 2006.
 * Comment: First of all, do not remove the AfD tag or our comments here. Secondly, you are free to provide reliable third-party sources (not the clan's HQ), and media coverage (not links to forums) to establish its notability. --Zoz (t) 10:47, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.