Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Enigma of the Warwickshire Vortex


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  16:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

The Enigma of the Warwickshire Vortex

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable book. Ridernyc (talk) 06:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Soft Delete. I can't see any basis for notability, but the article is awful, and it is not really my field. --Legis (talk - contribs) 08:58, 7 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in reliable, independent third-party sources. Should such sources be integrated into the article feel free to leave a note on my talk page and I'll take another look. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:42, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete- Suggested Merge With Non-canonical_Sherlock_Holmes_works It looks like someon trying to promote a book that didn't do very well the first time it was published.  That being said, It is also referenced in anoother book, "The Alternative Sherlock Holmes: pastiches; parodies and copies. that you can find on google http://books.google.com/books?id=DBGn5AkrI40C&pg=PA59&lpg=PA59&dq=the+enigma+of+the+warwickshire+vortex&source=bl&ots=cutPsPUNAs&sig=twWHM8AVgfiXaYyZfLp3GRM1G_c&hl=en&ei=vqLiTq3IOoOUgweVxd3fBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CCoQ6AEwAjgK#v=onepage&q=the%20enigma%20of%20the%20warwickshire%20vortex&f=false.  Elmmapleoakpine (talk) 00:12, 10 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.