Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Eulenspiegel Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep. - Mailer Diablo 14:07, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

The Eulenspiegel Society

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Given the lack of any third-party, reliable sources, I don't believe that a claimed membership of 800 is enough to meet the notability criteria of WP:ORG. RJASE1 Talk  00:22, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG, WP:ATT, and contains weasel words. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 00:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup per Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr's)] link below. [[User:Mr.Z-man| Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 22:13, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Potential keep, needs sources. Google News Archive results such as this show it has an international profile. (How is the number of members relevant to notability, anyway?) Within this societal niche they seem to have a lot of credibility. --Dhartung | Talk 00:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * weak keep since it is sourced--somewhat to my surprise. I never heard that weasel words was a reason to delete an article. It may be the only way to stay within the limits of V. DGG 01:41, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * I mentioned weasel words only to list some of the multiple things wrong with it. It still doesn't have any sources besides the group's homepage. Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 04:23, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is an important organization in the history of sexual minorities. Sources should be findable. In fact, I know someone who might know just where to find those sources, so I'd urge you not to delete the article right now. DoorsAjar 06:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, is covered a lot in a variety of books dealing with BDSM: . --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 15:02, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Cpt. Morgan. I added a minor source. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noroton (talk • contribs) 01:38, 29 March 2007 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.