Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Evil Dead (2013 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Evil Dead (franchise). (non-admin closure) Bryce  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:48, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

The Evil Dead (2013 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:CRYSTAL WP:NFF lead actress just dropped out, this movie has been nailed with issues causing rescheudle/cancelation issues frmo the start. Textbook case for NFF. Merge back to series, recreate in the future if it pans out Gaijin42 (talk) 19:19, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete without merge - there's no reason to have speculative information in the main franchise article, either. This is an encyclopedia, not an entertainment magazine.  MSJapan (talk) 20:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to The Evil Dead (franchise). It's just too soon to create this article. The franchise page already has all of this information (although it could certainly be tightened up to remove the more speculative content), so there's no need to merge. In fact, the entry is almost a complete copy of the information on the franchise page, with only a few other things added.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:20, 26 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * I changed my vote from an outright delete to a redirect to the franchise page. It would be something searched and a redirect would be a good idea. The information at present doesn't need to be merged, though.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 11:10, 27 January 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:48, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy redirect to The Evil Dead (franchise) per WP:NFF until topic notable in its own right. I agree with Tokyogirl79 that the information on that page could be tightened up, and also maybe a less speculative section title could be used - maybe "Remake"?  --Rob Sinden (talk) 14:59, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.