Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Evil Monk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Wifione  Message 16:24, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

The Evil Monk

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫  Johnny Mr Nin ja  02:14, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. No indication of wp:notability, and that's after the article being about 5 years old   Notice that it doesn't even say who makes it.  The web site for the product doesn't even have a company name, address or phone number, just an individual's email address.  Looks like one person trying to get a product going, probably from home.  I wish them success followed by wp:notability which it doesn't have now. North8000 (talk) 02:32, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. From what I could find, the name of the company is also the name of the drink (The Evil Monk) and despite the company's claims that they're the first alcohol made in Kansas since prohibition (which I doubt, legal or otherwise), there's just no reliable sources out there to show how this drink or company is notable. It looks to be an independent and small business that supplies alcohol to local stores, but hasn't managed to go beyond that at this point in time.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:19, 13 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
 * Delete - theevilmonk.com, states under the section "story" that the liqueur is manufactured by High Plains Distillery, so I visited their website and found that the product isn't even listed there. The creators of the product also claim that on June 15, 2006, their product made history by becoming the first liqueur made in Kansas since prohibition.  Great claim, too bad they have nothing to back it up but their own word.  SaveATreeEatAVegan 04:22, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.