Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Extraordinary Book


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Berlin International Literature Festival. (non-admin closure) f eminist 16:17, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

The Extraordinary Book

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG, advertising & WP:COI. The Banner talk 14:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:38, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment, this appears to be a copy of the german wp article also created by, so the talkpage should have a tag to that affect. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect this and Children´s and Young Adult Program of the Berlin International Literature Festival to Berlin International Literature Festival. Basically this is advertisement for this festival, and there seems to be not much secondary coverage as per WP:GNG. —Kusma (t·c) 08:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect (but attempt to find German speaking editors willing to find sources first) this and Children´s and Young Adult Program of the Berlin International Literature Festival to Berlin International Literature Festival. I could not find English sources, but there may be German editors who can find sources written in Germany. It appears to have a number of notable people involved.Knox490 (talk) 02:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect Sources are hard to digest into something concrete. Most recipients are notable in their own right. Jurors seem to gain real-world notability from being involved. But I can't see enough substance yet for a standalone article. Agathoclea (talk) 12:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.