Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The FBC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  howch e  ng   {chat} 19:51, 23 January 2006 (UTC)

The FBC
Looks like an NN internet radio station Werdna648T/C\@ 05:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

It is an internet radio station (sorry don't know what NN means) however it is part of the fur fandom something rarely understood or with alot of misunderstanding surrounding it. Has over 250 official listeners and a team of more than 15 people working on it including myself. It is played during Fur Cons and has it's own line of merchendise... surely this makes it notable (and considering people keep asking me about it having a wiki for it is considerably easier than having to tell people over and over). It is currently incomplete however and people are planning to come and add to it over the next few days. If you give us a chance to complete it before you delete every new article it might prove to be of some use. TornadoCreatorT/C\@ 05:48, 18 January 2006
 * "NN" is shorthand for "non-notable", indicating that the nominator believes the article os unsuitable for an encyclopedia entry. I suggest you review the Wikipedia inclusion guidelines at WP:WEB, to see if yout internet radio station passes the required marks to warrant inclusion. No Vote. -- Saberwyn - 05:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * It's not notable enough online yet however it has a following offline as well as it is played during conventions such as Anthrocon and Eurofurence both of which have a large turn out which would in turn make the radio station associated with the cons notable. TornadoCreatorT/C\@ 05:59, 18 January 2006
 * Sorry mate, it wouldn't. The best you can do is go back and work on your station, and if it becomes notable in the future an independent observer will be sure to add an article won't they? --kingboyk 23:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. no third party verification from a reputable source -- Astrokey44 |talk 09:46, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete admitted vanity page. Mark K. Bilbo 19:00, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Astrokey44. Stifle 17:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN, as TornadoCreator admits. --kingboyk 23:58, 19 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.