Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fabulous History of Men and Roses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  00:05, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

The Fabulous History of Men and Roses

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The only sources that I can find in a Google Search is Poop Report (one of the links in the article) and the article itself. Fails WP:NF. Schuym1 (talk) 22:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   —PC78 (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. No doubt the nom's search is complicated by the fact of this actually being two seperate documentaries... In the Name of the Rose and Sitting on the Throne, combined as a series under the longer title. I made a slight adjustment to the article, but I am not up to doing anything more for a French poo-poo film.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:03, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I did some searches and found no non-trivial coverage in third-party sources. --Jack-A-Roe (talk) 07:37, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: no significant 3rd party notability. JamesBurns (talk) 01:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: per nom and I agree with everything here. Laura (talk) 17:18, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.