Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fall (Robert Muchamore novel)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to CHERUB. Star  Mississippi  00:30, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

The Fall (Robert Muchamore novel)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Another contested redirect, using an WP:OSE argument - zero independent sources, fails WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 09:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:39, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature and United Kingdom.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: it seems unlikely that this book wouldn't meet WP:NBOOK, but there's an obvious redirect target at CHERUB. I think the outcome that would be most helpful to readers would be to expand the plot summaries presently in CHERUB from one or two sentences to a short paragraph, and then to redirect all the books that only have an infobox and plot summary to CHERUB. -- asilvering (talk) 23:41, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Redirect to CHERUB (with the history preserved under the redirect) per Deletion policy. I did not find significant coverage in reliable sources in my searches for sources. The book does not meet Notability. Cunard (talk) 09:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree with HouseBlaster's suggestion of a merge/redirect to CHERUB instead of just a redirect. Cunard (talk) 07:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to CHERUB. All the sourcing I was able to find are Amazon/Goodreads/etc., which are obviously not independent. However, the CHERUB could have a slightly longer plot description of the book – the current one looks like it is trying to avoid spoilers. Just redirecting seems to be a waste of good content that is needed elsewhere. HouseBlastertalk 17:48, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect Lacks independent sources to meet WP:NBOOK. MrsSnoozyTurtle 02:07, 16 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.