Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fallen Enigma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:26, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

The Fallen Enigma
As Moogy so eloquently put it, "random fangirl garbage". This is a story that is in the process of being written by an amateur. --Random fangirl 05:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

keep my heart & soul were put in2 this article..................................... 70.36.88.64 06:31, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, violates WP:V as there is no evidence that this even exists, and even if it did, it probably would not meet WP:FICTION. -- Kinu t /c  06:41, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom and WP:NOT. Infobox says Studio-Yet to be chosen Network-Yet to be shown Original run-not for – a while. Unpublished so fails notability, WP isn't supposed to be used to create notability. No ghits exc WP mirrors. I would suggest author copy the article onto a personal web page before it gets zapped, there's plenty of places to do that and other appropriate methods to promote creative projects. So don't give up, just don't put it here....Tubezone 06:59, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete Put your heart and soul into something else. Danny Lilithborne 07:08, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete "to blow away shoju cliches" kinda points out the fancruftiness. Elomis 08:30, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete. Why do people create these articles? -  jlao   0  4  12:03, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Er, I'm not sure what's up with the nominating account; it looks like a sockpuppet to me. Nevertheless, the article is about a work in development with no coverage from independent external sources. It's essentially using Wikipedia to advertise, in violation of What Wikipedia is not. Only internal links were added by scripts or anons. Definitely delete. --Slowking Man 13:09, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - not released, no sources, no studio, no evidence of real existence. -- Whpq 17:16, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and get a website --Steve 23:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete not verifiable Fangirl cruftslut 02:00, 1 November 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.