Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Famous tomb of Hazrat Pir Syed Muhammad Shah Jillani Baghdadi in Gambat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:17, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

The Famous tomb of Hazrat Pir Syed Muhammad Shah Jillani Baghdadi in Gambat

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This was dePRODed by the article creator without explanation. I PRODed it because I don't think this article can stay as is. If the topic is notable, this would need to be nuked and started from scratch as it's nearly incomprehensible. I couldn't figure out an appropriate speedy deletion criterion, so I'm bringing it to AFD. freshacconci talk to me  16:36, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Right now nuking the article seems like the best choice of action.--Jeffrd10 (talk) 16:49, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Draft as it right now seems as the best option, because, really article needs a huge clean up.  Alex discussion ★ 17:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:56, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 02:57, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 09:31, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TNT - most of it is nonsense or word salad. Tombs are rarely notable, and I don't see any reason to keep it.  Even if this notable, we'd need a new article, such as at Abdul-Qadir Gilani. Bearian (talk) 19:26, 9 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Incomprehensible. If this is notable, the material present here is no basis for an article. -- Whpq (talk) 15:21, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.