Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Farah Philosophy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Mr. L e fty Talk to me! 21:32, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

The Farah Philosophy
Prodded as a neologism by another editor, removed by the article's creator. No Ghits, fails WP:NEO Delete. --Richhoncho 18:16, 23 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep It asserts notability in argument as "often used in conversations".  Asked for citation.  JASpencer 20:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * "Asserts notability" is not a reason for keeping an article. Verifiability is, and this non-existent philosophy badly fails WP:V.  Did you notice the zero google hits?  Based on the ending of the article, this appears to be something the article creator made up himself based on a friend of his named Farrah.  Obvious Delete.  --Xyzzyplugh 23:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete NN neologism for Special pleading, and not a "philosophy" at all. Leibniz 20:44, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Asking for citation is not the same thing as getting one, and "often used in conversation" is another way of saying unverifiable. -- Fan-1967 21:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, original research; also noting the weasel words "often used". Punkmorten 08:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.