Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fashion Enthusiast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:00, 22 March 2022 (UTC)

The Fashion Enthusiast

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

This is an unsourced article, the infobox website of which directs us to a tumblr-based fashion blog. A version of this page has previously been draftified, though the creator of this page simply decided to re-create the page in the mainspace instead of working on the draft. Part of me thinks that this is a hoax, since the linked tumblr blog has not posted since 2017 despite the photograph in the infobox (labeled as "own work" and uploaded by the article creator) being dated "March 24, 2022". (update: an IP changed the infobox URL and it appears to be pointing at the website depicted by the image) In any case, the website appears to fail WP:GNG and WP:NCORP, so I propose that it be deleted. — Mhawk10 (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC) (updated: 13:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC))
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. — Mhawk10 (talk) 21:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:17, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete the website it links to has been dead 5 years and it looks like a wix site. The image posted is likely a copyvio as well. Nothing found in sources online, as was expected. Oaktree b (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - is there a reason why you didn't go with ? Seems like a pretty clear cut case to me.-KH-1 (talk) 00:54, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * It claims to be a worldwide fashion news website. I agree that this is obviously a delete, but I've seen previous tags of mine been declined because of similar claims of scope; previous declines I've received are making me hesitant here. I don't object to you placing the tag on the page if you feel that it's within the CSD criteria. — Mhawk10 (talk) 01:07, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Delete fails NWEB.-KH-1 (talk) 00:10, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment as nom. An IP made a few edits to the page. Among other things, the IP appears to have changed the listed site url to a site that at least has the same logo as the one in the article. It's not talking about the dormant tumblr blog, but it still appears to be a non-notable website. — Mhawk10 (talk) 13:48, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Gabe114 (talk) 12:25, 22 March 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.