Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fight Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. with no prejudice against speedy renomination (non-admin closure) czar ♔   15:38, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

The Fight Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I hate to do this, but, I'm fearing that this magazine might not pass WP:GNG let alone Notability_(media). Now, maybe it does pass #5 on that notability criteria - however, I'm struggling to find multiple reliable secondary sources that talk about the magazine outside of mere mentions regarding the a soap opera star coming out of the closet in the magazine.

Perhaps others disagree, and perhaps this will be kept, and that would be great, if it can be improved, but, my own exploration in improving it failed. :( SarahStierch (talk) 18:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 2 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, I admit it is tough to find secondary sources because of the generic/vague name of the magazine, simply, "The Fight", but sources do indeed turn up in searches for "the fight magazine" and/or "the fight" with LGBT in search parameters. Tough going research, however, this is the case indeed. Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 17:05, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:12, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.