Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fiji Book Flood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was no consensus. - Mailer Diablo 10:26, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

The Fiji Book Flood
This article reads like it is a report on a previously done study. While the subject does exist, gets about 10 hits on google, as the article is presented- it is written like original research. Fallsend 18:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Per Nomination. Fallsend 18:51, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
 * No participation apart from nominator. Relisting. -Splash talk 22:20, 27 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Weak keep with cleanup and a move to a better title. Yes, as written it is OR, but it documents an interesting situation.  Countering systemic bias (for me anyway) tips the balance just about in its favour. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] (W) AfD? 12:25, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete. It is OR. Surely there must be something that can be cited as a reference, even if it isn't on the Internet. --  Dalbury ( Talk )  13:00, 29 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, no original research. Stifle 15:36, 30 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - clearly not original research per google hits. Needs some cleanup though.  Very interesting topic. Zordrac 13:32, 1 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.