Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Filmgoer's Companion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 08:16, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

The Filmgoer's Companion

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Completely unsourced. NN book. Fails WP:GNG. UtherSRG (talk) 12:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 19:56, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Academic journals, Bibliographies, Film,  and Products. UtherSRG (talk) 12:07, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak keep All I can find are copies of the book for sale. There are some old reviews of it, , . I suppose they're ok. Oaktree b (talk) 13:44, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a longrunning major reference work in its subject, and has gone through more than a dozen editions. I'm finding it referred to as "essential", "the standard", etc. I think Oaktree's reviews could make a pretty decent stub for it. We should probably move the article to Halliwell's Who's Who in the Movies, leaving this original title as a redirect. -- asilvering (talk) 21:49, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep as per the reviews identified by Oaktree b for WP:NBOOK imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:36, 27 June 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.