Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The First Homotopy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Clear consensus for deletion. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 06:03, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

The First Homotopy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

"In this essay..." falls under WP:NOTESSAY &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;   &#9743;(talk)  02:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, when I saw this I assumed it was a copyvio, but didn't come up with anything. In any case, not an encyclopedia article. We've already got fundamental group, so this is arguably an A10. Opabinia regalis (talk) 03:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me?  07:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: obvious essay. Sadly no speedy-delete category exists for this case. -- KRAPENHOEFFER!  TALK  16:32, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete MicroPaLeo (talk) 01:14, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. WP:NOTESSAY; and we already have Homotopy group. -- 120.23.3.247 (talk) 07:17, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Snow Delete ... "In this essay we discuss" .... Need I say more.... – Davey 2010 Talk 03:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Honestly no point in continuing this discussion. Unsourced and obviously an essay. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:43, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.