Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Five Soft Drink Monsters

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 03:25, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The Five Soft Drink Monsters
Not notable. Google shows numerous hits which appear to be the author/publisher's own press releases. Factoring those out yields about 20 hits. This appears to be yet another attempt in user's (Andrew Lin?) "Stop Drinking Soda" campaign. Xcali 23:55, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. As mentioned, only hits on Google are press releases of this e-book. Cannot find any other third party evidence or credible stores that sell this material to establish notability. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 00:09, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Dissolve in a giant vat of Mountain Dew. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  01:33, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete stupidity. Ben-w 17:30, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable, self-promoting Shoaler 17:42, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. More Andrew Lincruft.  I've blocked him and his two known sock puppets for repeatedly recreating his anti-soda articles.  RickK 19:29, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ugh, not again. --Kiand 21:03, 30 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete & Ban Its bad that this person has this much free time Joey.dale 03:28, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment What?!?! I thought this was a prefectly good article describing a book a friend of mine wrote and published. &mdash; (Unsigned comment by 68.170.0.238.)
 * It's not so much the article as the topic of the article. The editors above feel that this topic is not notable enough (at least at this time) to be included in Wikipedia. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 09:03, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * KEEP!!! &mdash; (Unsigned comment by 68.170.0.238.)
 * [I removed the font tags from your comment. Using a font size of ten will not increase the weight of your vote, but it makes the page harder to read. &mdash; Knowledge Seeker &#2470; 09:03, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)]
 * KEEP!!! 128.2.247.100 17:23, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Fixed formatting. drini &#9742; 17:26, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Note that this voting user appears to be the another instance of the same person who wrote the article. He just began editing today, adding similar articles.  --Xcali 19:15, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * If Xcali is correct (which is almost certainly the case), then the above anon's vote is the second by the article's creator in this Vfd, the other being 68.170.0.238. See Requests for comment/68.170.0.238 -  Jersyko    talk   22:19, Jun 6, 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete drini &#9742; 17:26, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, for non-notability and just to annoy our little anonymous troll ;) Aecis 10:26, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.