Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Flying Dutchman (2000 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 15:42, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

The Flying Dutchman (2000 film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable film, all but one of the sources in the article are referencing a comprehensive film guide, which does not establish notability per WP:NFSOURCES, lacking significant coverage per WP:NF BOVINEBOY 2008 14:44, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:58, 2 August 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep. I have added some more sources and don’t see a problem. One substantial reliable source ( Film Review) would be enough, but others independent of the subject add to notability. Not the Hannibal Pictures site, as that is the distributor. Moonraker (talk) 23:26, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
 * One review is not enough per WP:NFO. Every other source is a database/comprehensive film guide entry which does not indicate notability per WP:NFSOURCES. BOVINEBOY 2008 10:57, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. I found a second review and a local news source. The coverage here is fairly light as a whole, hence the weak keep. I figure that releasing the same day as 9/11 probably didn't help this B movie gain coverage any. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  12:07, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep Per Moonraker and ReaderofthePack's rationale. Donald D23   talk to me  13:36, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep as since the nomination the article has been improved using coverage such as reviews in multiple reliable sources so that WP:GNG is passed and deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.