Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fold (brand)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. RL0919 (talk) 21:32, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

The Fold (brand)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. The references provided are mere mentions. Appears to claim notability by association, contrary to WP:NOTINHERITED. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:42, 10 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete In addition to the poor (and lack of) sourcing, this article relies heavily on it's coatrack. Praxidicae (talk) 17:49, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is clearly WP:PROMO.TH1980 (talk) 03:06, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. I'd G11 it if it hadn't an AFD - David Gerard (talk) 21:37, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Agreed that the original article appeared too promotional in tone. I have largely rewritten it. However, the Daily Telegraph article certainly amounts to significant coverage, as do those in Drapers and The Financial Times that I have just added. Edwardx (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that's vastly improved. Keep now. Nice one! - David Gerard (talk) 14:47, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep It's been improved sufficiently to pass the GNG. Philafrenzy (talk) 20:23, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Strong keep - Passes general notability guidelines. Good job at improving! Missvain (talk) 21:01, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment As nominator, I would happily withdraw the nomination given the excellent rescue work done by Edwardx. Given that some editors have supported the deletion and not since changed their !vote I don't think I can withdraw it, so the AfD will have to run its course. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 22:56, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
 * You can strike your text and add a "keep" ;-) - David Gerard (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.