Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Following Follows


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 22:07, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

The Following Follows
Probably a hoax; certainly an "unpublished work circulated on the internet" isn't notable despite the attempts to puff it up. Demiurge 20:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as per nom. Demiurge 20:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Look if that's what you want - I'll send you a copy of it Demiurge, any time you like! Would a hard copy slake the thirst of your evident and healthy curiosity?  I also wonder if my entry on 'difference (semiology)' is a hoax?  But maybe you've heard of that, you walking/talking/thesaurus/disambiguator you!  Why do you even need an encyclopedia, since you seem to know-it-all!  I am also wondering about your notions of 'notability' (look - even Wiki couldn't care less about your 'notability'!).  Well, my friend, you seem to be a bit of an expert on Irish history, but have you ever heard of the fellow Florence O'Donoghue (which clearly Wiki hasn't heard of either yet)?  Well then, there's more things in Ireland and Scotland than in your hinterland Demiurge.
 * DO NOT DELETE UNTIL DEMIURGE HAS BACKED UP HIS SLANDER OUS ACCUSATIONS. AS PER NORM. Mauberley 20:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable unpublished nonsense. --RMHED 20:45, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * , who posted the offending statement above, has a history of nonsense and has a section at WP:AN. Tracker/TTV (myTalk|myWork|myInbox) 21:40, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete It's great when vandals make it easy. Danny Lilithborne 21:54, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:BOOKS by light-years. Camillus (talk) 21:06, 7 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Save succeeds These are only suggestions by light-years. If you delete this page it's down to you - your subjective viewpoint.  Don't back it up with rules that a) are actually just suggestions and b) anyone could edit should they have a taste for creating unstatutory regulation.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.