Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Forum on Peachtree Parkway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Mr.Z-man 23:37, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

The Forum on Peachtree Parkway

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No notability. Just an open air mall, no substantial sources found. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 13:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletion discussions.   --  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 13:11, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM that fails WP:CORP. No notability is shown.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 17:13, 7 October 2008 (UTC)
 * weak keep I dislike seeing articles about shoping malls, as I feel that simply being a set of shops is not notable... but these sources seem have it to pass WP:GNG: . Sigh. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MichaelQSchmidt (talk • contribs)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 06:24, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Weak delete: Coverage in several sources has been demonstrated, but significant coverage probably has not (most of the sources are extremely brief, and they do little more than demonstrate that the mall exists)--so I wouldn't say that it necessarily passes WP:GNG. Cosmic Latte (talk) 09:16, 12 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.