Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Four Saviours


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Speedy delete, A1. Luigi30 (&Tau;&alpha;&lambda;&kappa;) 15:38, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

The Four Saviours, 'Aspinshaw'., The Kingdom of the Four Saviours
Nonsense or hoax, there are zero hits on "Marartar Lyon" on Google. Sandstein 13:20, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP is not a soapbox; promotion of personal belief, non-encyclopædic.  (aeropagitica)   13:24, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, and delete 'Aspinshaw'. and The Kingdom of the Four Saviours too, same brand of nonsense. Sandstein 13:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Aeropagitica, and also as a philosophically bankrupt feelgood philosophy. Kuzaar 14:11, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as soapboxing. --Ter e nce Ong 15:36, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom Funky Monkey 17:25, 14 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete as it is clearly someones own beliefs and surely everyone is entitled to their own religious beliefs-Erotica — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.249.155.237 (talk • contribs)
 * DONT DELETE Please dont delete this, we should we demote or delete someone else's beliefs? Why should this get deleted and not christainty or any other religion?-CrazedFan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pab123 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment: Pab123 has less than 50 edits, almost all of which deal with these articles and their votes for deletion. Also, to respond to the issue raised by this voter, I'd like to point out that Google is an accurate gauge of how much people are talking about the subject in question. Failing that, Adherents.com fails to list this "religion". Wikipedia is not made to be used to get word out about or advertise about your religion. It can go in here when it is sufficiently notable on its own to merit inclusion in an encyclopedia. Kuzaar 14:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Dont Delete maybe this has no hits on google but why should we rule our lifes by google. I feel that someone's beliefs are surely mor eimportant than some mechinal search engine?-Waterfall — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.249.155.237 (talk • contribs)
 * Comment: Note that user 213.249.155.237 has attempted to vote twice on this vote for deletion, "signing" them differently. Kuzaar 14:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC) < ever heard of a network?


 * Nonsense and/or promotion of somebody's personal beliefs. Delete all. 'Aspinshaw'. and The Kingdom of the Four Saviours may well be candidates for speedy deletion. - Mike Rosoft 14:51, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unverified. Zero Google hits? That's hard to achieve. Also, from the article: Marartar Lyon died in 2002 and the quest stopped.. So bye. Delete the other articles too. Herostratus 15:34, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete The Four Saviours and The Kingdom of the Four Saviours as unencyclopedic nonsense (applying WP:SNOW). Delete 'Aspinshaw'. for now, due to lack of evidence that this particular belief system is held by any substantial number of people (or in fact anyone at all).  Kelly Martin (talk) 15:36, 15 March 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.