Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Four Trees


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Merge to Caspian (band). &mdash;Crazytales talk/desk 20:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

The Four Trees

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:MUSIC. It's a contested speedy so I'm putting it on AFD for input.  1 redrun  Talk 12:14, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'm not even sure the band meets WP:MUSIC. The album certainly doesn't. Betaeleven 13:00, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. No comment. M.V.E.i. 16:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - This is not a poll. Please state why you think the article should be keept.  1 redrun  Talk 07:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:OUTCOMES -- if an artist is notable, their albums are notable too. The band seems to pass WP:MUSIC, so their album is notable enough for its own page. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 18:43, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - WP:NOTINHERITED? WP:OUTCOMES does not state that if a band is notable (maybe barely so in this case) their albums are notable as well.  1 redrun  Talk


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,


 * Keep and Expand The band itself is notable, having gone on a tour. This makes its albums somewhat notable. However, the album article currently appears to be no more than a simple track listing. So, they should consider expanding the article such as writing a short production history or what not. Otherwise, the album should be merged into the article of the band per WP:MUSIC.--Alasdair 08:56, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Assuming the band is notable, and I make no judgement on that fact, WP:OUTCOMES indeed does not suggest anything about album notability. Also, there's no useful content in the article to justify it being separated.  One could easily just add the track listing to Caspian (band). --User: (talk) 19:12, 9 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.